Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
In his attempt to purchase the chocolate sauce which he saw in an advertisement, Todd agreed to the online contract of Foodmart stating that sales prices are applicable to items not included in advertisements and the stocks will be dependent on the existing inventory of the nearest store to the customer. Todd demanded to be offered all of Foodmarts chocolate sauce stocks in the 3 stores within the 10 miles radius and demanded to get them at the discounted price or else he will sue. Todd will lose the case because he initially agreed upon the terms and conditions of the grocery store that limits the sales of chocolate sauces from the inventory available at the nearest store and Todd had no right to attain the chocolate sauce at a discounted price because it was stated in the terms and conditions that items in advertisements are not included in the online promotion. Todds claims are based on the inventory not provided by him and the sales price of the advertisement not given to him; because of his agreement to the grocery stores online contract, he will lose the case. The standard Uniform Commercial Code is still followed in the e-commerce contractual issues but the UCC cannot fully cover contracts under the e-commerce law. Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code purposely does not give notice to the electronic commerce sector but courts are invited to apply Article 2 of the UCC when goods are associated with the transaction (Towle, 2003).
Reference List
Legal Information Institute. (1992). Uniform Commercial Code: Article 2 Sales. Web.
The American Law Institute and National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. (2000). Revision of Uniform Commercial Code Article 2-Sales. Web.
Towle, H. (2003). Revised UCC Articles Erect New Hurdles for E-commerce. Legal Backgrounder, 18 (16). Web.
Uniform Commercial Code. Web.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.