Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Professors post:
“As discussed in the lecture and reflected in the readings, moral philosophy tends to assume the existence of free will. This tendency is reflected across history and across cultures. Given the seeming necessity of some capacity for free choice if there is to be any meaning to morally laden ideas such as good and bad, right and wrong, this presumption of free will is unsurprising. After all, the very distinction between moral and immoral behavior most broadly construed seems to depend on it. There are many different ways of sorting this out, from ideas about “radical freedom” — where human freedom is thought to be all but unconstrained — to the strongest concepts of destiny and determinism — where free will does not exist at all. Between these lies compatiblism, which, whatever the details, acknowledges some degree of free will and some degree of determinism. What is your view on the matter? And why? [In your post please make at least one reference to the lecture or reading.]
Kwame Gyekye, “Destiny and Free Will: An African View,” (pp. 365 – 373)
these are the pages to read on the pdf file i attatched.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.