Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Please read:
Wrzesniewski, A., Schwartz, B., Cong, X., Kane, M., Omar, A., & Kolditz, T. (2014). Multiple types of motives don’t multiply the motivation of West Point cadets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 10990–10995.
Write a 2 page response paper and submit here. A brief outline of a proper response paper can be found in the syllabus, and is copied below. Please note this is not the requirement; if you feel you know how to do a journal review and critique by all means use your own methodology. This is just an example appropriate guide.
Why is this study important / why was it run?
What is/are the hypotheses?
Methods descriiption
Results summary
Critique
Do the authors convince you this is worthwhile to conduct in terms of the overall study of Motivation? Why or why not?
How do you feel the design of the study reflects the study of Motivation? Would this have been more appropriate in a case study (or an experiment or quasi-experiment as appropriate)
How do the results and conclusion tie back to the introduction and most importantly, our study of Motivation during the semester?
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.