Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The well-known 1831 revision of Mary Shelleys Frankenstein has several meaningful differences from its original 1818 edition. Mary Shelley made revisions to the book to appease conservative readers who objected to the books first examination of science and its repercussions (Butler 313). By including lengthy passages in which Frankenstein expresses religious guilt, Shelley turned the emphasis away from scientific desire and curiosity and towards a more sympathetic portrait of the characters (Butler 303). However, it is debatable whether these revisions are an improvement, as they contradict Shelleys original intent for the novel.
These changes may have improved the books appeal to conservative readers, but they have detracted from its original investigation of science and its effects. Through highlighting Frankensteins regret, less onus is placed on the novels central themes of the perils of science and the results of human ambition. This arguably detracts from the novels original message. For this reason, although the revision might have served its purpose of placating Shelleys peers, it can hardly be called an improvement.
As it stands, certain events can be identified as the reasons for these revisions. According to Butler, they were most likely implemented as a damage-control measure due to the public panic caused by the Edinburgh murders of Burke and Hare (313). By adapting Frankensteins motivations, Shelley hoped to downplay the radical impression that the novel initially left on its readers and thus escape the negative associations.
Personally, my response to the events and characters of the novel has also been changed by these revisions. I find the novels original exploration of science and its consequences more thought-provoking and ultimately compelling. Unfortunately, despite the fact the revisions emphasize Frankensteins remorse in an attempt to change him to a sympathetic character, I feel they also serve to make him less intriguing as a character.
It can be concluded that Mary Shelleys changes in the 1831 edition do not seem to be an improvement to the original version. It is true that some might argue that the changes make the book more approachable and less contentious. However, they detract from the books original themes, such as the exploration of science, human ambition, and its repercussions, ultimately divorcing the novel from its roots.
Works Cited
Butler, Marilyn. Frankenstein and Radical Science . Frankenstein. A Norton Critical Edition, edited by Paul J. Hunter, Norton, 1993, pp. 302313.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.