Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The Islamic Republic of Iran repudiates claims that it manufactures as well as possesses weapons of mass destruction. Iran is a signatory to a number of United Nations statutes and international treaties. The fact that Iran has questioned the existence of Israel as Jews homeland and threatened to annihilate it has further complicated the issue.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has insisted that its nuclear program is purely based on energy purposes, considering the urgent need of adequate energy given its rapidly growing population. To make its case, Iran questions the international community on their restriction upon the republic regarding the generation of nuclear power, while oil, which is their primary source of energy, is non-renewable and may be depleted in future.
The argument for the legitimate pursuit of nuclear energy by Iran has, however, been opposed by Israel and the United States. Led by the United States, the concealment of the nuclear technology and the facilities that are being used by Iran has been a point of contention between Iran and other world powers. Lebanons Hezbollah and Hamas of the Gaza strip enjoy a close friendship with the Islamic Republic. Israel as an arch foe with Iran points out that those nuclear weapons will be readily available to such militant group.
This easy accessibility of weapons of mass destruction will eventually result in a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Such a scenario will ultimately plunge the Middle East into deeper chaos.
The ongoing negotiation between Iran and the world powers is a positive step towards accomplishing a consensus. It is important that the negotiating leaders prioritize a safer world, free of nuclear weapons (Shultz, Perry, Kissinger, & Nunn, 2007). They should avoid chasing their political interests and stereotype antagonism to strike a suitable deal. The agreement should ensure that Iran thrives as an economy in Middle East by alternative sources of energy.
References
Banken, J. A. (2004). Drug abuse trends among youth in the United States.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1025(1), 465-471.
Beyers, J. M., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: the United States and Australia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(1), 3-16.
Broeders, D., & Engbersen, G. (2007). The Fight against Illegal Migration Identification Policies and Immigrants Counterstrategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(12), 1592-1609.
Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 591(1), 98-124.
Jandl, M. (2004). The estimation of illegal migration in Europe. Studi Emigrazione, 141-156.
Klein, Y. L., Osleeb, J. P., & Viola, M. R. (2004). Tourism-generated earnings in the coastal zone: a regional analysis. Journal of Coastal Research, 1080-1088.
Lew, A. A., Hall, C. M., & Timothy, D. J. (2008). World geography of travel and tourism: a regional approach. Oxford,, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Massey, D. S., & Pren, K. A. (2012). Unintended consequences of US immigration policy: explaining the post1965 surge from Latin America.Population and Development Review, 38(1), 1-29.
Merrill, D. (2009). Negotiating paradise: US tourism and empire in twentieth-century Latin America. Univ of North Carolina Press.
Norris, P. (2008). Driving democracy. Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work, 29-50.
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2014). Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
Perloff, R. M. (2013). Political communication: Politics, press, and public in America. Routledge.
Shultz, G. P., Perry, W. J., Kissinger, H. A., & Nunn, S. (2007). A world free of nuclear weapons. Wall Street Journal, 4, A15.
Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., & McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 19662003. American sociological review, 71(4), 565-588.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.