Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Focus of Essay
The 21st century has been characterized by growing environmental concerns. Today, it is becoming obvious for many people that humanity has a great effect on nature, and researchers propose new ways of reducing this impact. Recycling is one of the areas, which receive much attention in terms of environmental protection, and there are several points of view regarding recycling. The concept of four Rs represents the nature of this process, serving as the guideline for people who want to reduce their effect on the environment. However, the exact interpretation of these points, as well as their use in practice, needs to be elaborated. The purpose of this essay is to examine the concept of four Rs in the context of recycling and give an explanation to each of the points while offering a potential fifth R.
Research and Analysis
Ever since environmental protection became an important issue, researchers have been searching for ways to reduce the poor impact on humanity. As society develops rapidly, so does peoples consumption of modern goods, many of which require plastic and other artificial materials, which take a long time to decompose. Garcia and Robertson say that global plastic pollution becomes evident, reaching critical levels both on land and in the ocean (870). It is important to provide people with effective solutions to environmental issues while letting them keep the same level of comfort in terms of lifestyle. Recycling is one of those solutions, and Cohen acknowledges its crucial status in the present situation (180). He says that recycling diverts waste from landfills, and specialized facilities are able to redirect the material to other purposes (Cohen 180). While many people want to start recycling on a daily basis, they need a comprehensive guideline for reference. The four Rs of recycling serve this purpose, meaning Review, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. In order to provide a better understanding of this approach, it is needed to explain each point in more detail.
Review (Rethink)
The first point of the four Rs can be phrased in several ways, which are usually Review of Rethink. It is important to be aware of the actual situation with waste pollution to choose the correct approach. According to Vecchio, humanity generates about 1.3 billion tons of waste every year, which causes a significant problem for the environment. The purpose of recycling is to reduce this number, but it must be done properly to ensure positive results. Besides, it is an energy-consuming process that requires a lot of effort, which is why those who want to begin this practice must be informed of all its aspects (Vecchio). While the scale of the issue is undoubtedly global, small actions of every household can contribute to the overall improvement. Before taking actual measures, it is useful to analyze ones own consumption and take stock of what is used and how much waste is thrown at least within a week (Vecchio). Having considered the situation, a person will have a better understanding of their influence on the environment and potential ways of reducing it.
Reduce
The second point is universally accepted due to its importance in the global context. Today, an average person uses a wide range of products, which later become waste, and it is vital to reduce consumption. At the same time, it is also important to make sure people can maintain their preferred quality of life even within environmentally friendly policies. Therefore, this point mainly suggests reducing excessive, unnecessary consumption in a considerate manner. The described stage corresponds with the principle of eco-efficiency, which Cohen describes as doing more with less (180). It naturally derives from the Rethink step, during which a person can analyze their consumption and determine the ways to reduce it. Some waste reduction policies are imposed on consumers, and Wagner calls single-use plastic shopping bags ban as the most prevalent form (3). However, each person is capable of making a difference without community-wide restrictions by simply rationalizing their consumption of such materials. For example, even if single-use plastic bags are allowed, it is better to refrain from using them unless necessary. This way, the consumption level will be lower, and societys recycling capabilities will improve.
Reuse
The third stage is another important part of the global process, which can be used in every household. As implied by its name, the Reuse point suggests that particular items can be used more than once. This way, the purchase of new similar products will be delayed, indirectly reducing the production of waste. Obviously, reusing must be rational and convenient, as every product has its own lifespan, and it is impossible to continue this process forever. Nevertheless, Vecchio proposes that each person must ask themselves if there is a potential use for an item before they throw it in the trash. In fact, unlike the previous point, reusing remains a matter of personal discretion, which can barely be influenced by restrictive policies. Macintosh et al. concluded that a single-use plastic shopping bag ban is not particularly effective in terms of recycling, as customers opted for single-use paper bags instead. This tendency means that restrictions are capable of reducing consumption while not being as effective for reusing. Each person must make their own choice, for example, to shop with a reusable textile bag to contribute to waste reduction.
Recycle
Finally, the process reaches the stage of actual recycling for further use of the material. This point represents the natural development of the process, being its ultimate peak. This idea suggests that a person begins by considering their consumption and reducing it whenever possible. Next, products and items are reused within their lifespans for as long as there are suitable for their purpose. In the end, once the quality of the reusable product no longer satisfies the consumer, it must be sent for recycling. Cohen writes that paper, bottles, and cans form the majority of recycled products today, but this list can be easily extended. For example, Sandin and Peters state that it is possible to recycle textiles and see significant environmental benefits. Moreover, according to Cohen, it is possible to recycle entire areas, re-orienting abandoned industrial zones for other purposes (181). However, Vecchio argues that recycling must be reasonable and justified to ensure that such facilities can handle the workload. In general, recycling is a process accessible to everyone, but communities must also support environmentally aware practices with effective policies.
Potential Alternatives and a Fifth R
The framework of Rs presented above is widely used, but there are other systems, as well. For example, it is possible to explain the four Rs Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Repurpose. In this case, the final stage will be to find a new use for old, recycled products and materials. This framework also develops gradually, from one point to the next one, and repurposing is its ultimate result. However, it appears to lack the important element, which is Rethink or Review, and all environment-oriented practices must be informed and considered (Vecchio). Therefore, it seems possible to merge the two models into one system of five Rs: Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Repurpose.
At the same time, there also exist potential alternatives, which can be given the role of the fifth R. Since environmentally friendly activities must be aware of all aspects surrounding them, it may be useful to discern another element at the first stage. It is not enough to review the current situation with plastic consumption and recycling. Each person must willingly acknowledge how they can affect the situation and what the results might. A fifth R should be placed between Rethink and Reduce, and it is Realize.
Conclusion
In conclusion, recycling remains a crucial practice aimed at the protection of the environment. It is a complex process, which includes several important steps continuing one another. First of all, a person must review their contribution to global waste production and think of possible solutions. Secondly, it is needed to reduce the consumption of certain products to a minimum if it is possible. Thirdly, certain items can be reused several times within their lifespans without losing their qualities. Finally, products which cannot be used anymore must be recycled so that the material can be repurposed. Additionally, a fifth R may be considered, which is Realize, as people should be aware of the benefits and costs of recycling. Overall, recycling is a positive practice, but it must be used carefully and accurately to ensure the best results.
Works Cited
Cohen, William J. People, Places, and Environment Reader. McGraw Hill Education, 2014.
Garcia, Jeannette M., and Robertson, Megan L. The Future of Plastics Recycling Science, vol. 358, no. 6365, 2017, pp. 870-872.
Macintosh, Andrew, et al. Plastic Bag Bans: Lessons from the Australian Capital Territory. ScienceDirect, 2019, Web.
Sandin, Gustav, and Peters, Greg M. Environmental Impact of Textile Reuse and Recycling A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 184, 2018, pp. 353-365.
Vecchio, Alexandra. The Four Rs: Review, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Mass Audubon, 2020. Web.
Wagner, Travis P. Reducing Single-Use Plastic Shopping Bags in the USA Waste Management, vol. 70, 2017, pp. 3-12.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.