Category: Court
-
Analysis of Key Areas to Be Improved in Victorian Criminal Court System: Appointment of Judges, Due Process, Mandatory Sentencing
Chosen Topics: Appointment of Judges Due Process Mandatory Sentencing 1. Appointment of Judges The process of appointing heads of jurisdiction has been the topic of a public debate within recent years. The Judicial Conference (2015 pvi) outlines that the Executive government is responsible for such appointments, obligated by the parliament who is ultimately selected by…
-
Analysis of Rhetorical Strategies in The Speech of Miss Polly Baker before a Court of Judicature
The speech Miss Polly Baker, before a Court of Judicature, was given in a court in 1747. Miss Polly Baker who lives in New England was prosecuted for the fifth time for having children without marriage. She represents her financial instability, so she is unable to hire an attorney to argue for her. She is…
-
Criminal Courts in Scotland
In Scotland, there is a vast difference between the criminal and civil courts structure. The different courts settle different cases solving individual disputes. The civil courts structure handles legal disputes involving individual matters in different categories by the type of dispute, such as company law, family law, and partnership law. Its main focus is to…
-
Case of Kelo Vs New London: Essay
In this essay, I am going to review one of the most reviled Supreme Court cases in the United States, the 2005 Kelo v. New London case. In the Kelo v. New London case, New London, a city in Connecticut, used its eminent domain jurisdiction to confiscate remote property to vend to private developers. The…
-
Analysis of Roe vs. Wade: To What Extent Is It the Role of the Judiciary to Intervene in Politics
The role of the judiciary in the political process is a complex one, and, as with much else in politics is essentially a question of who wields power. In recent times, it is also an issue that has achieved significant public salience, with high-profile Supreme Court rulings on both sides of the Atlantic occurring at…
-
Essay on Ethical and Philosophical Issues: Analysis of Roe v Wade
Philosophy is composed of the 3 branches: Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Value Theory. Metaphysics is the branch that studies the nature of reality. Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that studies the scope of human knowledge. Value theory is comprised of two distinct subsets: ethics and aesthetics. Ethics is the branch that evaluates human interaction. Aesthetics…
-
Essay on Importance of Neuroscience in Courtrooms
As neuroscience begins to grow, it will soon be able to find the objective in the human brain and reveal to courtrooms the secrets hiding in a criminals mind. The first-time brain scans were used in a courtroom was in 2003. To understand the topic better, understanding how the brain works is something to discuss…
-
Essay on Court Cases
Ethical concerns are very relevant when working with these different populations: nonviolent, violent, and trauma victims. Psychologists should remain aware of the relationships they have with their clients as well as make sure to stay competent in their work. When working in the prison setting, you will face many challenges due to the prison having…
-
Personal Experiences Stories: My Experience in a Courtroom
My Experience in a Courtroom At first, when I chose to go to a courtroom proceeding I was slightly nervous and at the same time curious about what is actually done in a courtroom. It was my first time taking a visit to a courtroom; therefore, I didn’t know what to expect. Until I went…
-
Essay on Court Observation
The proceeding I observed was a continuation of a trial. It was on November 1st, the courthouse was Robert S.K. Welch Court House and the trial was for the case R. v R.C., which occurred in room number 5. The judge in charge of the trial was Justice Huge K. Atwood. The trial was about…