HIGHEST YEAR SCHOOL COMPLETED
—
by
in .000</td, .000</td, .306</td, .637</td, </tr, </tr, <p, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <tr, 1.000</td, FATHER</td, HIGHEST YEAR SCHOOL COMPLETED, Respondents highest degree</td, Sig. (1-tailed)</td, Strategy Evaluation</h2
FATHER Pearson Correlation Respondents highest degree 1.000 .345 .306 HIGHEST YEAR SCHOOL COMPLETED
—
by
in -.148</td, -1.095</td, -1.104</td, .048</td, .287</td, .287</td, .566</td, .566</td, .651</td, .684</td, </p, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, <div class=""webkit-scrollbars webkit-scrollbars–table"", <p, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <th, <tr, <tr, <tr, <tr, <tr, <tr, 14.10</td, 14.50</td, 16.00</td, 16.17</td, 25</td, 25</td, 5, 5.451</td, 5.726</td, 5</td, 5</td, Kurtosis</strong, Maximum</strong, Mean</strong, Mean</th, Median</strong, Minimum</strong, Motivation, Motivation</strong, Physical Activity</strong, Skewness</strong, Std. Deviation</strong, Std. Error of Kurtosis</strong, Std. Error of Mean</strong, Std. Error of Skewness</strong, Strategy Evaluation</h2, Table 2. Descriptive statistics</em, We take time to understand each others needs and concerns in each new situation</td
the descriptive statistics provides crucial information about the variables using a unified format. Second
—
by
in .000(a)</td, .000</td, .058</td, .234</td, .256</td, .376</td, .396</td, .53505</td, .578</td, .619(a)</td, .656</td, (9), (Constant)</td, </p, </p, </p, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </td, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, </tr, <div class=""webkit-scrollbars webkit-scrollbars–table"", <em, <p, <p, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td, <td colspan=""2"", <tr, <tr, <ul, 1.378</td, 1</em, 1</td, 16.672</td, 16.672</td, 2 </sup, 25.511</td, 42.183</td, 56.565</td, 6.897</td, 7.656</td, 94</td, 95</td, A Summary of Model.</em, Adjusted R Square</strong, ANOVA (b).</em, b</sup, B</td, B</td, Beta</td, Co-efficient (a).</em, Df</strong, df</td, F</strong, F</td, Mean Square</strong, Mean Square</td, Model</strong, R Square</strong, R</strong, Regression</td, Residual</td, Sig.</strong, Sig.</td, Sig.</td, Standardised Coefficients</strong, Std. Error of the Estimate</strong, Std. Error</td, Strategic Evaluation</h4, Strategy Evaluation</h2, Sum of Squares</strong, Sum of Squares</td, T., t</td, Total</td, Unstandardised Coefficients</strong, was 0.396.</p, while R<sup, X3SE</td
while the outsourcing performance was the dependent variable. According to the table below
—
by
in </li, </li, </li, </li, </td, </td, </ul, </ul, <li, <li, <p, <td, <td, <td, <td, 5, 5</td, 6</td, 6</td, 60 marks</td, diagrams and appendices.</div, Harvard Referencing system correctly applied.</div, The Harvard referencing system is used by the researcher.</div, The project report is formatted using the Anglia Ruskin guidance on formatting project reports.</div, The team celebrates success and spends time to learn from failures</td, TOTAL MARKS</strong
correct spelling & grammar
| 1.00 | 4.00 | 2.41 | 0.93 | 110 |