Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Primarily, according to the author, the most convincing, objective, and reliable criticism of male moral theorizing is the concept that focuses on the ethics of duty and justice. Thus, Baier (7) believes that men are more likely to make decisions based on the systems of fairness, honesty, and decency. Moreover, the researchers note that boys and adult men tend to focus on societys laws, norms mainly, and standards without going beyond what is permitted, and their morality is instead based on abstract concepts (Vinney). As practice shows, men show justice in any situation, including in various conflicts. Consequently, he believes everyone should get what he deserves while respecting him as a person and without violating his inalienable rights.
In addition, it should be noted that the student believes that the potential response by a male moral theorist could be expressed as follows: Every person is a blacksmith of their happiness, and their head may serve as a hammer or an anvil. Thus, an individuals actions, faith, or thoughts form a particular period of life. In this case, a man is ready to endure persecution for his beliefs and take responsibility for his actions; life is a boomerang, and everything and everyone gets what they deserve. It should be emphasized that a man will probably answer what he wants and strives to live honestly, without deception, and according to conscience. For example, in fairness, most men are still honestly performing their duties while being among colleagues, family, or even strangers on the street, and most of them are not afraid of the unstable situation in the country or the world, nor the risk of failure.
Works Cited
Baier, Annette C. Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics. Harvard University Press, 1994.
Vinney, Cynthia. The Carol Gilligan Theory and a Womans Sense of Self. Verywell Mind, 2022.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.