Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The perception of poverty in America critically contributes to deepening the social divide between the elite and the impoverished. In the past, the focus has been on how the individual encourages patterns of poverty without acutely representing the countrys societal failings. It is essential to analyze the history of political and economic frameworks to understand how impoverishment occurs. American attitudes and perspectives on poverty do not reflect the societal challenges that plague the ordinary citizen and require a structural overhaul to address these challenges adequately.
Food, shelter, and living conditions create the context of social poverty in modern America. Poverty in society is characterized by the loss of labor, which directly impacts the ability of American families to feed themselves. Previous analyses conducted by Dubois, Charles Booth, and Seebohm Rowntree attributed poverty to poor working conditions and wages (Butz, 2016). The latter part of the 20th century introduced a decided shift that deviated from blaming the economy and its breakdown on the deficiencies of the human character. Corporations invested in providing more benefits for their workers to motivate higher profits. Currently, societal beliefs divide between blaming the individual for not having enough drive to work hard and infringements by societal conditions.
Government policies such as the creation of welfare are met with resistance, especially from welfare mothers. Those who depend on government subsidies do not trust the policies created will benefit them. Additionally, society views them as lazy, which is a contradiction due to the ability of welfare mothers to balance jobs, family support, and welfare money to live in the community affordably (Butz, 2016). The poverty threshold created by Molly Orshansky compares a familys resources or expenditures with a widely acceptable dollar value (Butz, 2016). A family is a basic unit of measuring success in society and experiences more success if both partners work full-time to provide resources.
Conflict theory accurately describes poverty in a competitive and ever-growing community. Karl Marx placed great importance on class structure and emphasized the elite, who he believed challenged the poor to better themselves (Butz, 2016). From a theoretical perspective, it gained credence in the 1960s mainly due to competing values in the varying groups within America. It stems from a capitalistic point of view and is evidence of an overly negative view (Simon, 2016). Nevertheless, social conflict is easily created primarily because of the racial or gender inequalities that define America. The differences in society, such as gender, religion, and race, form an imbalance where each group is expressly interested in executing their values or practices. In contrast to functionalist or interactionist theories, conflict theory best explains how poverty transpired in the country and the continuing impact on social behavior.
In conclusion, poverty is not an individuals fault but rather a direct result of social, economic, and political circumstances. The family is the most effective way of measuring societal performance and in the past century, it has gradually deteriorated in America. The lens of conflict theory best explains the divide between the elite and the impoverished. Each group champions its values in the most effective way possible to achieve stability in a society divided along with race, gender, and religion. Additionally, families must ensure the provision of resources such as food, shelter, and basic requirements of education to their offspring. A combined effort of effective social and economic policy and concerted individual efforts will minimize poverty in America.
References
Butz, A. M. (2016). Theorizing about poverty and paternalism in suburban America: The case of welfare sanctions. Poverty & Public Policy, 8(2), 129140.
Simon, R. (2016). The conflict paradigm in sociology and the study of Social Inequality: Paradox and possibility. Theory in Action, 9(1), 131.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.