Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Reliable arguments are crucial in law since they help to achieve the desired outcome. However, it does not necessarily mean that every argument is good, as some people may use vagueness, ambiguity, and generality to twist the conversation in their favor. For instance, in law, the definition of ambiguity means the circumstance when a term has several definitions or can refer to multiple subjects. In other words, a statement can be considered ambiguous if it has more than one meaning (Moore & Parker, 2017). In law, it is often used when a participant of the dispute insists on accepting the interpretation of the statement that is profitable only for him or her. In this regard, vagueness can play an important role, too, since it prevents the argument from reaching a clear and evidence-based conclusion. In terms of the law, vagueness creates gaps in discussions and requires a precise interpretation of circumstances and definitions. Generality is heavily related to this phenomenon as it lacks specificity.
Otherwise stated, the arguments are considered general if they have an indefinite meaning or refer to multiple people. For instance, the vague statement about the poisoning of the representative of Russian opposition Navalny prevents anyone from making precise accusations. According to news, Charite hospital does not provide a clear and decisive conclusion about his health state and says that it is likely that he has been poisoned (Durden, 2020, para. 10). Therefore, it is still difficult to decide whether there is someone who encroached upon him or not. In conclusion, it would appear that these three factors can be successfully used to achieve the desired outcome in a discussion, which is crucial in a trial. For this reason, the ability to recognize such methods, as well as to contradict them, is one of the primary skills that are necessary for my future career.
References
Durden, T. (2020). UKs Johnson Reprises Skripal Saga For Navalny Poisoning . Corona Stocks. Web.
Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. (2017). Critical thinking: Evaluating claims and arguments in everyday life. McGraw-Hill Education.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.