Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Several years after the estimated date when Rome fell, the empire remains legendary and historically famous for its civilization in the military, political, and social institutions. Scholars and other historians justify the unsustainable challenges that promoted the empires fall. However, philosophical deconstructions of the socio-political challenges before and after Rome fell result in parallel arguments, some blaming external attacks for the annihilation, whereas others take on moral decadence. This paper argues that continuities and discontinuities that promoted Romes fall were multidimensional, implying that all justifications are theoretically significant for understanding the empires decimation.
Attacks by the Barbarian tribes resulted in a chain of military losses that culminated in the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 C.E. External attacks were consistently deliberating to the defense system practiced within Rome. A letter by Jerome decrying the fate of Rome disclosed the impacts of military aggression on the renowned empire, noting that Barbarians made consistent attacks by bursting Danube barriers and waging war at the empires capital (Jerome, The Fate of Rome ). The Ostrogothic, Visigothic and Frankish kingdoms were adversaries of the name of Christ, whose idea of continuity was to obliterate Roman emperors while maintaining the empires dominion (Augustine 4). Therefore, in light of what I have read, Jeromes and Augustines explanations seem to be the actual accounts of events that led to Romes downfall.
Continuities and discontinuities between Rome and its successor kingdoms exacerbated the weaknesses exposed by the relentless attacks. Transformations in regional imperial frameworks and integration between social classes and economic exchange networks characterized continuity dynamics. However, the Byzantines shifted power balances between peasants and aristocrats, marking the discontinuity between the Roman administration and the Eastern empires political models (Augustine 46). Leadership changes from centralized power in Rome to Charlemagnes rule over the Holy Roman Empire from the Frankish Kingdom was an obliteration of Romes dominance.
In conclusion, attacks on the Roman Empire led to its fall, where historical accounts reveal that multiple aggressors decimated Romes military strength. Rome fell in 476 C.E. after fighting over three decades of the Barbarians invasions. Jerome and Augustines accounts provide the most credible accounts of the empires downfall, factoring in external and internal forces that overpowered Rome. Government reforms and other discontinuity factors that shifted power from Rome to the Frankish and successor kingdoms sealed the empires downfall to end its historical influence.
Works Cited
Augustine, Aurelius. The City of God: Volume I. Gutenberg. 2014. Web.
Jerome, The Fate of Rome c. 409. Web.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.