Article Selection: Following article to review: Study 1 Berardo, D., & Mussa, M

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

Article Selection:
Following article to review:
Study 1
Berardo, D., & Mussa, M.V. (2019). Application of a relational tool to support acute cardiac patients’ emotional recovery: Analysis of effects during acute and follow-up care. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Wellbeing, 14(1). doi:10.1080/17482631.2019.1595957 
Nursing Research
ISBN: 9781975110659Authors: Denise Polit, Cheryl BeckPublisher: Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPublication Date: 2019-12-09Edition: 11th
Resource Manual for Nursing Research
ISBN: 9781975153991Authors: Denise Polit, Cheryl BeckPublisher: Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPublication Date: 2019-12-09Edition: 11th
Guidelines and Questions:
Review the guidelines in Chapter 1 of your textbook and other required readings.
Review the ‘questions of fact’ from the application exercises on p. 6 of the Resource Manual.
Review the preliminary questions in Box 1.1 (p. 17) and Box 3.3 (p. 59) of your textbook.
Use the Module 1 Assignment Template
Download Module 1 Assignment Template to answer your questions. Please use this template as your submission. You DO NOT need a title page or reference page. Do not alter this template. You may expand upon the boxes (if needed), but please limit your submission to 1 page. 
THIS IS THE TEMPLATE: THIS IS WHAT HAS TO BE ANSWERED IN PAPER FORMAT
Assignment: Preliminary Review of a Selected Study
Name
Date
Chosen Article (in APA format):
Answer the following questions regarding your chosen article. (questions adapted from your text Nursing Research & the Nursing Research Resource Manual)
What was the underlying
purpose of the study?
Explain the relevancy of this study to the practice of nursing.
What is this study about? (Phenomena, Concepts,Constructs)
Is the study basic or applied research? Explain your answer.
What is the type (research methodology) of the study? For example: quantitative experimental, qualitative grounded theory.
Did the study follow the IMRAD format? Explain why or why not.
Summarize the findings of the research study.
Could the research team have conducted this study as either quantitative or qualitative?
Explain your stance (why or why not).
Review and Analysis:
Conduct a preliminary review of the chosen article.
Ensure your analysis covers the specified questions and guidelines that are mentioned above in the template.
Submission Requirements:
Format your work according to APA guidelines. .
The submission should not exceed the 1-page template. 
Points and Evaluation:
This assignment is worth 150 points. References must be within 5 years and from the U.S.A.
Please review the assignment rubric attached to this submission for the detailed evaluation process.
 
NU615 Graduate Assignment Rubric (1)NU615 Graduate Assignment Rubric (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsContent Relevance40 ptsResponse demonstrates an in-depth review and discussion of the topic. Viewpoints are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.28.57 ptsResponse demonstrates a general discussion, and viewpoints are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.20.57 ptsResponse demonstrates a minimal discussion. Viewpoints are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment.0 ptsResponse demonstrates a lack of discussion. Viewpoints are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided/ 40 ptsCritical thought/ Reasoning/ Synthesis40 ptsResponse shows strong evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).30 ptsResponse shows evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).20 ptsResponse shows little evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s).0 ptsResponse shows no evidence of critical thinking, reasoning, and synthesis of ideas and insights gained from reading(s)./ 40 ptsQuality of Information50 ptsResponse includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly.35 ptsResponse includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed.20 ptsResponse is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed.0 ptsResponse excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally, inadequately, and/or not at all./ 50 ptsStructure/APA Format20 ptsWriting is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar, syntax, or APA errors.13 ptsWriting is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, syntax, or APA errors.8 ptsWriting is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, syntax, or APA errors0 ptsWriting is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response/ 20 ptsTotal Points: 0

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now